Close Menu
BestNewsOnline
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    BestNewsOnline
    • Retirement planning
    • Insurance
    • Real estate
    • Subscription
    BestNewsOnline
    Home»Insurance»Health insurance companies are overpaying for some hospital radiology services – InsuranceNewsNet
    Insurance

    Health insurance companies are overpaying for some hospital radiology services – InsuranceNewsNet

    October 21, 20224 Mins Read
    WhatsApp Facebook Telegram

    EAST LANSING, Michigan, 21st of October (TNSres) — University of Michigan posted the following news:

    * * *

    According to a new study by University of Michigan researchers.

    * * *

    According to a new study by University of Michigan (MSU) researchers published in the journal Radiology.

    “Many commercial plans leave money on the table when negotiating prices with hospitals, especially for expensive CT and MRI scans,” the study co-author said. Ge Baiformer doctoral student Eli Broad College of Business at MSU and current professor of accounting, health policy and management at Johns Hopkins University. “The high prices paid by commercial plans eventually come back to bite patients and providers through high premiums and out-of-pocket fees.”

    Hospitals usually have several insurance plans, some of which are managed by the same insurance company. The study found that insurance companies negotiated different prices for the same services within the same hospital and even negotiated different prices in their own health plans.

    Researchers studied negotiated commercial prices (not list prices or fees) from private payers for the 13 purchasable radiology services — services that can be scheduled in advance — that are designated by the US Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. On average, the maximum negotiated price for purchasable radiology services was 3.8 times the minimum negotiated price at the same hospital among various insurance companies and 1.2 times the minimum negotiated price at the same hospital among multiple health plans from the same insurance company.

    Services that require expensive equipment, such as a CT scan and MRI, had greater cost variations and higher prices in Medicare compared to other radiology services. The largest price discrepancies were found for CT scan services, where 25% of hospital-insurance pairs – hospitals and insurance companies that have a contract together – had set their maximum negotiated price at more than 2 .4 times their minimum negotiated price. .

    The final rule on hospital price transparency requires WE hospitals to disclose pricing information. Previous research on price transparency has found widely disparate negotiated commercial prices for purchasable radiology services in hospitals.

    “With most goods and services, you know the price before you choose to buy. Prior to the adoption of the hospital transparency rule, many medical services did not make their prices publicly available, so patients and payers wouldn’t know until after they were billed,” said John (Xuefeng) Jianglead author of the study and Eli Broad Endowed Professor of Accounting at MSU.

    “Price transparency has removed the blindfold from commercial payers, forcing them to recognize the fact that they are often overpaying,” Bai added. “Equipped with pricing information, radiologists can change the landscape of care delivery to the benefit of patients and payers.”

    Increasingly, insurance companies are negotiating pricing based on a percentage of Medicare rates to improve pricing fairness and understandability. The study results, however, suggest that some health plans may have negotiated prices less effectively than others, including those run by the same insurance company.

    The study also found that higher prices (compared to Medicare) for more expensive services imply higher hospital profitability. This could potentially motivate hospitals to shift investments from low-cost imaging to high-cost imaging without considering the additional clinical value. Therefore, such measures can result in inefficient spending for both patients and payers.

    Research suggests that price variations in the commercial market create an opportunity for radiologists to provide high-quality, low-cost care in non-hospital settings for the benefit of patients and commercial payers.

    “We hope this research will help patients realize that, with consistent quality, they can find and purchase radiology services that they can afford and insurance plans that best meet their needs.” Jiang said.

    * * *

    REVIEW: Radiology https://pubs.rsna.org/journal/radiology

    * * *

    Original text here: https://msutoday.msu.edu/news/2022/health-insurance-companies-overpay-for-some-hospital-radiology-services

    Add A Comment
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    What's hot

    Market woes hit Florida government pension plans

    January 11, 2023

    Betterview announces partnership with True Flood Risk

    January 31, 2023

    Real Estate Transfers – Mount Airy News

    October 23, 2022

    Alexandria Real Estate Equities Inc. stock outperforms the market on a strong trading day

    November 18, 2022
    Don't miss

    Housing market forecast for 2023: when will house prices fall?

    January 14, 2023

    On Coastside, the volume of real estate sales collapses as interest rates rise | Local News

    February 1, 2023

    Asset Advocates Real Estate and Contract Lawyers Announces Grand Opening of Real Estate Law Firm in Spring Valley Las Vegas

    December 31, 2022
    Picked for you

    LACERA invites tenders for the system’s emerging real asset management program

    Retirement planning February 2, 2023

    The Los Angeles County Employees Retirement Association invites proposals from qualified companies to implement the…

    BestNewsOnline.net is owned and managed by

    Top10 International FZ LLE
    Office 2002, 20th Floor, Creative Tower
    Fujairah, United Arab Emirates
    TRN: 100608946800003

    • Home
    • Contact us
    • Privacy policy
    • Terms and services
    The information on this website does not constitute investment advice or a recommendation or a solicitation to engage in any investment activity. This website and its content are not intended for residents of the UAE, US, Canada, Australia, UK, Russia, North Korea, China, Japan, Hong Kong, Singapore and Iran.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.